informed consent - what should be and is not included by clinicians

by Rose Rohloff

Over the last several decades, physicians/PAs have conditioned themselves too often to react with symptom = write prescription, and just follow protocols. A doctor who writes a prescription may be paid for it, regardless of whether you don't fill it, and can document lack of compliance, even when the clinician did not provide full information to be able to have INFORMED consent.

Each person, in each individual situation, needs evaluation regarding whether a medication is necessary or not, and safe/appropriate. It is up to that person to make decisions with their clinician, not by the medical staff - or worse, an AI computer - without full data. Before a clinician gives a drug or writes a prescription for someone, the following questions should be answered to obtain true informed consent or refusal.

Informed Consent

​1- What is the drug classification, the exact mechanism of action = what exactly is it doing in my body or the body of my loved one?
2- Was this researched, efficacy tested with chimera = baby organs cut out while they're alive, to be put into mice for drug/shot testing which is violating our religious right to not participate with child sacrifice/anything that is an abomination to God?
[Read my blog Modern Child Sacrificing Continues]
3- List all side effects and contraindications, including immediate, short AND long-term. 
4- List all causations to my condition or that of my loved one, and how have they been addressed or ruled out, including: lifestyle changes; diet; possible heavy metal/chemical exposure; parasites; imbalance of micronutrients, especially copper, iodine, selenium, manganese, magnesium, zinc, Iron (Fe2 vs Fe3); Vitamins D, Bs ... etc.
5- What are all the natural alternatives? 
6- What are the latest independent studies not from pharmaceutical companies or those on the payroll or in bed with Pharma?
7- Where are all the primary Pharma and independent studies to show that the condition is not from the Covid Spike Protein, known to not be excreted by the body, and/or other shots or drugs?

If situations involve your body, your health, your SOUL integrity, no true clinician upholding an oath to do no harm would get defensive by discussing any of the above.

Time to Decide

A very important element not discussed, and often violated by hospitals and MDs is the concept of time to make a decision, and giving of all necessary information listed above.

• Emergent: something must be done within an hour (< 1 hour) to prevent mortality (death) or morbidity (severe injury). An example is an aneurysm that is leaking or about to burst, etc.  
  
• Urgent: something must be done within < 24 hours to prevent mortality (death) or morbidity (severe injury). An example is a severe break that needs setting, or excessive bleeding, etc.  
  
• Elective/Selective/NonEmergent/NonUrgent: As the list refers to, nothing imminent and people can take days/weeks to research to make good decisions for themselves after becoming fully informed. Examples include, but not limited to, joint replacements, general maintenance medications, "vaccines" and other shots. 
  

Informed Refusal

In a previous blog, I reviewed being proactive with a document listing any and all things already fully researched with informed, established refusal. Read with this link.