1974 National research act - Why you should know

by Rose Rohloff

​On July 12, 1974, the National Research Act (Pub. L. 93-348) was signed into law, there-by creating the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. One of the charges to the Commission was to identify the basic ethical principles that should underlie the conduct of biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects.

​The 1974 Research Act was created in entirety from the Belmont report, and put into place to prevent the Government, it agencies or representatives, military and private companies, from violating an individual's freedom: by forcing, tricking or coercing persons for research, testing and administration of unknown injections/materials, and experimental procedures. This law was enacted after a century long track record of precedence including, and not limited to, the following:

• Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) wide use (1940s-1972);
• Nuremberg War Tribunals (1947);
• Thalidomide with massive birth defects (1950s-60s) which led to the Kefauver Amendment (1962) "... to the Food, Drugs, and Cosmetic Act, also known as the Drug Efficacy Amendments of 1962, was signed by President John F. Kennedy and requires that all new drug applications demonstrate substantial evidence of the drug’s efficacy for the marketed indication, in addition to the existing requirement of demonstrating the drug’s safety ... In addition, the Amendment required drug advertising to disclose accurate information about side effects and efficacy of treatments.;
• Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) experiments (1950s-60s);
• the Radiation experiments (injection of radioactive elements, including polonium, plutonium, and uranium, into civilian patients around the country, (April 1945 and July 1947);
• Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (1930s-70s);
• Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 (updated 2000) built upon the Nuremberg code as the basis for Good Clinical Practices;
• Chester M. Southam, MD, a noted immunologist at Sloan-Kettering Institute, obtained funding from the government and injected live cancer cells into 14 patients with advanced cancer and into healthy convicts at Ohio State Prison, and injected live cancer cells into 22 elderly patients at Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in Brooklyn (1954-1963) “Every human being has an inalienable right to determine what shall be done with his own body. These patients then had a right to know the contents of the syringe: and if this knowledge was to cause fear and anxiety or make them frightened, they had a right to be fearful and frightened and thus say NO to the experiment. (Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, 2008)”
• Operation Crimson Mist, Rwanda (1994) electromagnetic augmentation (5G)
  

The law may not be negated, overwritten, or manipulated to force participation in experiments - by the government, employers,  or companies, especially pharmaceutical companies - for whom the law was written to protect us; especially by labeling Emergency Use (EU). EU is  for emergency circumstances with Informed Consent as part of Right to Try, if there are no other options for a patient.  EU cannot supersede or try to negate the law especially regarding being fully informed with the Right To Say No - and the Right to Try alternative treatments. ​

the_belmont_report_hhs.gov.pdf
File Size:	259 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

---

Demonstrated lack of Respect for Persons and their protections in violation of 1974 law.
1- Autonomous agents, individuals capable of deliberation about personal goals and of acting under the direction of such deliberation. The Government and companies have to give weight to autonomous persons' considered opinions and choices, and cannot obstruct their actions and judgments, nor deny individual freedom to act on considered judgments, and cannot withhold information necessary to make a considered judgment. Necessary information includes - but not limited to - all medical opinions by established, industry experts, health status, the necessary assessments, labs, with close monitoring of physical lab and test follow ups of each and every autonomous persons as part of clinical research and testing, along with full documentation of testing, efficacy, use of chimera for research and testing, any and all conceivable side effects, and interactions of conditions.​

COVID-19 clinical protocols
Nov 2020
Phase I not completed until after 2022

Nov 2020 Protocols

2- persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to added protections.
Violators to the law have been marketing to the most vulnerable, including the immature and the incapacitated who were in need of extra, added protections, even to the point of excluding them from any injections or procedures which may harm them; violating added safety precautions for children, elderly, or those with diminished capacity. 

Informed consent - must include full disclosure of ALL contents to be injected, any and ALL possible side effects (which can be several pages long), how those persons are individually to be closely monitored, safety guidelines, and above all the right to say no before or at any time, and full reporting of all individuals regarding their safety monitoring/labs/assessments, and any and all side effects. By promoting COVID shots all still under clinical trial/research, and coercing with careers/jobs, inability to travel, etc. in order to take the shots, this law is being violated through: lack of informed consent, lack of protections of autonomous persons, and/or illegally acting as IRSB board members marketing to those not autonomous and capable of self-determination, with higher standards of protection to be invoked, and assuming the role for their safety.

The maxim "do no harm" has long been a fundamental principle of medical ethics. Claude Bernard extended it to the realm of research, saying that one should not injure one person regardless of the benefits that might come to others. 

An agreement to participate in research constitutes a valid consent only if voluntarily given. This element of informed consent requires conditions free of coercion and undue influence. 

Undue influence also includes offers of an excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Also, inducements that would ordinarily be acceptable may become undue influences if the subject is especially vulnerable as in the case of targeting children, persons with limited capacity, and elderly with elements of mental defect, or instilling fear.

Short term morbidity and mortality cases from the shots are well reported and known, such as death, myocarditis along with spontaneous cardiac arrest with no warning, debilitating neurological conditions, etc. And, there is no means yet to determine mid and long term effects because Phase I trials have not been competed, let alone Phase II and III - which is vital information in order to determine informed consent.

Injustice has been performed with companies and government representatives, by involving vulnerable subjects, including the young, those unable to fully comprehend with all necessary information, and scaring parents with compromised capacity for free consent. In addition to lack of individual, tightly scheduled, continual monitoring and follow ups, autopsies of all persons involved in this trial participation should be conducted for reporting by the pharmaceuticals companies for any and all persons who received the shots, as well as labs determining efficacy and detriments (as examples, antigen creation, D-dimer, Pulse Cardiac and Troponin Tests) for all those who were coerced or unduly influenced to participate in research. 

This law was created to protect people from government abuse through experimentation. The government cannot arbitrarily dismiss components, create resolutions or stipulations to supersede the law, as to invalidate its protection of individuals from them, including, but not limited to Health and Human Services (HHS) Center for Disease Control (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institute for Health (NIH), etc. and pharmaceutical companies, etc.  

Persons have been illegally acting as members of, or bypassing, IRSB safety review and monitoring of each and every person receiving injections, with open undue influence and coercion, to participate in Covid injections. Coercion has been especially directed to the diminished autonomous, children and elderly, through TV ads, library recordings, verbal encouragement, schools or other public venues acting as government agents, and/or clinical researcher recruiting participants, and/or illegally as untrained IRSB member who is not following up to ensure safety of the people they recruited, coerced or used undue influence.

Overall lack of informed consent has become too often common practice across the healthcare industry, including people being given consent forms hours or minutes prior to surgery; no alternative treatments or lifestyle-nutrition changes prior to medications begin prescribed, and undue influence to intubate or perform surgery on patients in lieu of alternative treatments.​