Each person, in each individual situation, needs evaluation regarding whether a medication is necessary or not, and safe/appropriate. It is up to that person to make decisions with their clinician, not by the medical staff - or worse, an AI computer - without full data. Before a clinician gives a drug or writes a prescription for someone, the following questions should be answered to obtain true informed consent or refusal.

​1- What is the drug classification, the exact mechanism of action = what exactly is it doing in my body or the body of my loved one?
2- Was this researched, efficacy tested with chimera = baby organs cut out while they're alive, to be put into mice for drug/shot testing which is violating our religious right to not participate with child sacrifice/anything that is an abomination to God?
[Read my blog Modern Child Sacrificing Continues]
3- List all side effects and contraindications, including immediate, short AND long-term. 
4- List all causations to my condition or that of my loved one, and how have they been addressed or ruled out, including: lifestyle changes; diet; possible heavy metal/chemical exposure; parasites; imbalance of micronutrients, especially copper, iodine, selenium, manganese, magnesium, zinc, Iron (Fe2 vs Fe3); Vitamins D, Bs ... etc.
5- What are all the natural alternatives? 
6- What are the latest independent studies not from pharmaceutical companies or those on the payroll or in bed with Pharma?
7- Where are all the primary Pharma and independent studies to show that the condition is not from the Covid Spike Protein, known to not be excreted by the body, and/or other shots or drugs?

If situations involve your body, your health, your SOUL integrity, no true clinician upholding an oath to do no harm would get defensive by discussing any of the above.

A very important element not discussed, and often violated by hospitals and MDs is the concept of time to make a decision, and giving of all necessary information listed above.
Emergent: something must be done within an hour (< 1 hour) to prevent mortality (death) or morbidity (severe injury). An example is an aneurysm that is leaking or about to burst, etc.  
Urgent: something must be done within < 24 hours to prevent mortality (death) or morbidity (severe injury). An example is a severe break that needs setting, or excessive bleeding, etc.  
Elective/Selective/NonEmergent/NonUrgent: As the list refers to, nothing imminent and people can take days/weeks to research to make good decisions for themselves after becoming fully informed. Examples include joint replacements, general maintenance medications, 'vaccines" and other shots. 

In a previous blog, I reviewed being proactive with a document listing any and all things already fully researched with informed, established refusal. Read with this link. 

Too often, media or public figures convolute issues with complex over/misinformation. Below is a high-level, brief overview to hopefully simplify the issue of COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2.

Humanized Mice defined as "mice engrafted with functional human cells or tissues ... in various areas of biomedical research." Link Basically, government & pharma buying fresh baby tissue, stem cells or organs to put into or on an animal to test shots and drugs.

And exactly who funded it ... ? 

In review, GOF are "experiments that modify pathogens—such as viruses—to enhance their transmissibility, virulence". Taking a spike protein that one engineers, and inserting into the backbone of an already engineered virus is experimenting with a pathogen to make it more virulent, correct? 

They knew spike protein attack ACE2 before they intentionally attached it to the SARS-CoV they had already created, and PHARMA KNEW the toxic, bioengineered SPIKE PROTEIN went to all organs, and crossed the blood brain barrier (BBB) in animal testing - especially the bone marrow, adrenals, liver, spleen, and ovaries ... and should never have gone to humans? 

The SPIKE PROTEIN is the very important element we should be discussing, because:

• "the human body contains over 100,000 different types of proteins,
• each protein has unique functions essential for life, and
• proteins are built from 20 standard amino acids arranged in specific sequences determined by DNA.
• ACE2 expression in endothelial cells is widespread throughout the vasculature, particularly in arteries and veins, where it is found in both endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells." ​

Something natural cannot be patented. Below are "Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Baric; Ralph. The latest application filed is for 'sars-cov-2 viruses and methods of use thereof'".

On a final note:

​"2020 L-Arginine Study: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted by researchers at Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore found that adding oral L-arginine (a natural, key amino acid) to standard therapy in patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 significantly reduced hospitalization duration. The study, involving 169 patients, showed that those receiving L-arginine had a median hospital stay of 25 days compared to 46 days in the placebo group. (54% improvement)
Clinical Outcomes: Patients in the L-arginine group also experienced a reduced need for respiratory support, with 71.1% showing improvement at 10 days ..."​ Link to read

And yet, US Doctors and the Governments "did not know" about this, a natural amino acid that is a precursor for Nitric Oxide production combatted the effects of the bioengineered, GOF spike PROTEIN in an acute care hospital?

Demonstrated lack of Respect for Persons and their protections in violation of 1974 law.
1- Autonomous agents, individuals capable of deliberation about personal goals and of acting under the direction of such deliberation. The Government and companies have to give weight to autonomous persons' considered opinions and choices, and cannot obstruct their actions and judgments, nor deny individual freedom to act on considered judgments, and cannot withhold information necessary to make a considered judgment. Necessary information includes - but not limited to - all medical opinions by established, industry experts, health status, the necessary assessments, labs, with close monitoring of physical lab and test follow ups of each and every autonomous persons as part of clinical research and testing, along with full documentation of testing, efficacy, use of chimera for research and testing, any and all conceivable side effects, and interactions of conditions.​

Posted by Brian Ward on X

Link to the full document 5th Circuit Hospital illegal mandate for Covid shots

Posted by Brian Ward on X
Guess what? Defendants in our lawsuits no longer argue that they had a right to mandate EUA drugs due to their state's at-will employment doctrine. That the EUA drugs can be mandated. That they had the authority to even issue the mandate. Why? Read the 127 pages, and then you'll understand that it was a legal lie from the beginning, but due to the novelty of the laws, no one knew of them. As courts have stated, "sometimes laws take naps," and these laws never showed up for work until now. https://coloradomedicalfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Stamped-Final-Complaint.pdf

full document https://coloradomedicalfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Stamped-Final-Complaint.pdf
page 127
C. the Secretary has no “authority to require any person to carry out any activity that becomes lawful pursuant to an authorization under this section…” 549. In 2005 Congress passed the PREP Act94 which provided the following regarding preemption of state law: (8) During the effective period of a declaration under subsection (b)…no State or political subdivision of a State may establish, enforce, or continue in effect with respect to a covered countermeasure any provision of law or legal requirement that— (A) is different from, or is in conflict with, any requirement applicable under this section; and (B) relates to the…administration…of the covered countermeasure, or to any matter included in a requirement applicable to the covered countermeasure under this section or any other provision of this chapter, or under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.]. 550. Therefore, via the PREP Act and 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3, Congress expressly prohibits Defendants from: A. interfering with the authority of the Secretary, B. establishing a condition not authorized by the Secretary, C. establish conditions contrary to the Secretary and the congressional statute under 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3, D. mandate participation in any 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 product or PREP Act activity, E. interfere with an individual considering participation in a 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 product or PREP Act activity, F. penalize a person refusing to participate in a PREP Act product or activity or 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 product. 551. The executive branch of the United States Government purchased all COVID-19 licensed and EUA drugs using federal funds. Congress expressly prohibits the federal government​

Brian Ward  @GodsRiddles  Nov 1, 2023
Breaking…Gov Gavin Newsom and Kaiser have been sued in federal court for requiring healthcare workers to inject an experimental drug into their bodies as a condition to sell their labors in the marketplace. The requirement violated the workers’ Equal Protection of Laws and Due Process rights. Moreover, Kaiser signed a contract with the CDC promising not to mandate participation but did so anyway. Kaiser and Newsom fraudulently concealed the fact that nurses would be required to forfeit litigation rights if they incurred an injury from the use of the experimental drug. The California Nurses union stood by and refused to stop Newsom’s tyranny, leaving members without representation. Governor Newsom perpetuated the greatest assault on the US Constitution in the state’s history and the CA AG did nothing to prevent it. Worse yet, is that CA and Kaiser already had an agreement with HHS promising to never place an individual under a sanction for refusing to inject federally funded experimental drugs into the body.

Brian Ward - Twitter Oct 25, 2023
​Legal Fact: Any state that penalized citizens or denied unemployment benefits to an individual terminated for the sole reason of refusing to inject an unlicensed investigational drug into their body violated the individual's Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Due Process rights. The U.S. Congress conferred legal authority onto an individual to either accept or refuse an EUA product. Both options were enacted by a valid act of Congress and must be equally protected. Moreover, the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution denied that state authority from interfering in the chosen option. The state established what courts call an Unconstitutional Condition. SCOTUS said: "But the power of the state in that respect is not unlimited; and one of the limitations is that it may not impose conditions which require the relinquishment of constitutional rights. If the state may compel the surrender of one constitutional right as a condition of its favor, it may, in like manner, compel a surrender of all. It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence." Governors and state agency directors violated their oath of office & the Constitution the moment they required COVID-19 EUA participation and or penalized an individual's federally protected option. They deprived citizens of their interest in liberty and property and, unfortunately for some, their very lives, all without due process. They did so by applying the law unequally demoting those who refused to that of a second-class citizen.

Brian Ward  Aug 2022
BREAKING: LA Superior Court requiring LAPD to reinstate an officer terminated for refusing the vax mandate. Full back pay too! This is under a Writ of Mandamus, which is rare.

Legal Fact: 100% of all hospitals and nearly all universities signed a FEDERAL agreement to abide by the ethical principles of the Belmont Report, though few know it, ANYTIME they involve a human with an investigational medical product such as any available COVID-19 drug. The report is only 10 pages long, but it holds in part: (1) Respect for persons incorporates at least two ethical convictions: first, that individuals should be treated as autonomous agents, and second, that persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection. The principle of respect for persons thus divides into two separate moral requirements: the requirement to acknowledge autonomy and the requirement to protect those with diminished autonomy, (2) To show lack of respect for an autonomous agent is to repudiate that person's considered judgments, to deny an individual the freedom to act on those considered judgments, or to withhold information necessary to make a considered judgment, (3) Respect for persons requires that subjects, to the degree that they are capable, be given the opportunity to choose what shall or shall not happen to them. BONUS ROUND - All US States and Territories signed this agreement pre-pandemic too. Yup, no one knows this either, including state attorneys general. Lastly, unlike the Nuremberg Code, the Belmont Report has the force of law via federal statute and contract.
Last edited9:28 PM · Aug 2, 2023​​

Brian Ward via Twitter 
The VERY first EUA issued was in 2005 for the Anthrax investigational drug for service members and civilian employees of the DoD. The EUA stated: A. Individuals (service members and civilians) who refuse anthrax vaccination will not be punished. (Emphasis added) B. Refusal may not be grounds for any disciplinary action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. C. Refusal may not be grounds for any adverse personnel action. Nor would either military or civilian personnel be considered non-deployable or processed for separation based on refusal of anthrax vaccination. D. There may be no penalty or loss of entitlement for refusing anthrax vaccination, E. This information shall read in the trifold brochure provided to potential vaccine recipients as follows: You may refuse anthrax vaccination under the EUA, and you will not be punished. No disciplinary action or adverse personnel action will be taken. You will not be processed for separation, and you will still be deployable. There will be no penalty or loss of entitlement for refusing anthrax vaccination. Nothing in law has changed to negate the authority of DoD members to refuse EUA COVID-19 drugs except the 6 civilian appointees engaged in willful misconduct against our Armed Forces.
11:51 PM · Sep 3, 2023

by Rose Rohloff

Changes in vancomycin use in renal failure Stefaan J Vandecasteele 1, An S De Vriese pub in 2010
Abstract A progressive increase in vancomycin resistance with consequent treatment failure has been observed in staphylococci. Therefore, new dosing guidelines advocating much higher vancomycin doses have been issued. Target trough levels of 15-20 microg/ml are proposed. Whether and how these targets can be achieved in patients with chronic kidney disease or those on dialysis are still under evaluation. The higher vancomycin doses to achieve these treatment targets carry a substantial risk for nephrotoxicity. This risk is incremental with higher trough levels and longer duration of vancomycin use. Critically ill patients, patients receiving concomitant nephrotoxic agents, and patients with already compromised renal function are particularly at risk for vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity.

​by Rose Rohloff