by Rose RohloffWhy does this information matter? Water is more than we have been taught - the 4th stateBiochemistry has understood and taught (or used to teach to all clinicians including nurses, PAs and doctors) the acid-base balance equation for homeostasis. H2O + CO2 = H2C03 = H+ + HCO3− (or) water + carbon dioxide = carbonic acid = hydrogen + bicarb And schools have taught there are three states of water: solid, liquid and gas. Many have known for decades, there is a fourth (4th) state of water, known as liquid crystal or structured water. Beyond liquid, solid, and vapor, there’s a 4th Phase of water (also known as Structured Water, Exclusion Zone Water, and H3O2). While we were all assuming we knew water, Dr. Gerald Pollack was forming a new relationship with water, learning about H302 ... the 4th phase of water. Somewhere between a liquid and a solid, there’s a gel state to water. It’s not thick, but more silky than H2O with one extra hydrogen and oxygen molecule.
Dr. Pollack, Professor of Bioengineering [email protected] Office: Foege N210A Dr. Gerald Pollack, Science to Sage Magazine - Link to video, "The Fourth Phase of Water" Living Water Video link describing the 4th state of water. "Discovered 2001?" (see below) From the STARGATE collections (declassified CIA documents)The government has known about for decades. Classified document 1978 Our bodies create lightDr. Jack Kruse 051: Your Mitochondria & Biohacking by Scott Mulvaney 02/20/2017 Link to video Speaking about the work of Dr. Becker and Fritz-Albert Popp, a German biophysicist known for his pioneering work of biophotons in 1960s-70s Full Interview link begin 3:00:00. Other countries have been studying this such as "scientists doing this work both in Japan and Russia... mitochondrial DNA create light" ...
Bone emits infrared light How water moves through the body |
Risk of 5G rolled out, without safety studies, by Federal, State and Local governance. Communities were not asked regarding rollout, or informed regarding safety issues of 5G. Are we experiencing history repeating the dangers of severe medical handicapping and deaths of DDT, Asbestos, many FDA "approved" drugs recalled because they lacked safety, toxic fluoride in water, etc.? | ‘Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.’ The quote is most likely due to writer and philosopher George Santayana, and in its original form it read, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” |
Experts raising safety and health issues
LTC (ret) Doc Pete Chambers MD, Green Beret, Special Operations, flight surgeon bioweapons expert (WMD, CBRNE, Biowarfare)
Operation Crimson Mist - Rwanda 1994 .PDF “electromagnetically augmenting” anger into uncontrollable rage - electromagnetic pulsing Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document. | 5G friend or Foe .PDF Overview of the technology, use case examples of cease & desist because of health issues Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document. |
Insurance Policies
9th Circuit Court Ruling |
(1) The court ruled that the district court misapplied the 1905 Jacobson case because LAUSD relies on a drug that Plaintiffs plausibly alleged did not prevent the spread of the virus.
(2) LAUSD has changed its mind about requiring the vaccine and therefore, the case cannot be mooted because LAUSD has proven it will just enact it again later.
(3) The court said, "But even if the materials offered by LAUSD are subject to judicial notice, they do not support rejecting Plaintiffs’ allegations. LAUSD only provides a CDC publication that says “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.” But safe and effective for what? LAUSD implies that it is for preventing transmission of COVID-19 but does not adduce judicially noticeable facts that prove this."
(4) "Pursuant to more recent Supreme Court authority, compulsory treatment for the health benefit of the person treated—as opposed to compulsory treatment for the health benefit of others— implicates the fundamental right to refuse medical treatment. Plaintiffs’ allegations here are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right. Defendants note that the vaccination mandate was imposed merely as a “condition of employment,” but that does not suffice to justify the district court’s application of rational-basis scrutiny."
(5) MUST READ THIS..."In Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997), the Court explained that Cruzan’s posited “‘right of a competent individual to refuse medical treatment’” was “entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,” in light of “the common-law rule that forced medication was a battery, and the long legal tradition protecting the decision to refuse unwanted medical treatment.” Id. at 724–25 (citation omitted). Given these statements in Glucksberg, the right described there satisfies the history-based standards that the Court applies for recognizing “fundamental rights that are not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.” Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., 597 U.S. 215, 237–38 (2022). The Supreme Court’s caselaw thus clarifies that compulsory treatment for the health benefit of the person treated—as opposed to compulsory treatment for the health benefit of others— implicates the fundamental right to refuse medical treatment." https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf…
by Rose Rohloff
THE ORIGINAL HIPPOCRATIC OATH ALTERED & EXPANDED
I (name) will perform my duties with faith and trust in God as my guide, and continually learn as long as I perform my duties. I will impart a knowledge of the art of healing, mentoring and teaching those I serve. Above all else, I will abstain from whatever is deleterious, mischievous, malfeasance or unjust to those being treated, and I will not break what is not broken, for that is doing harm.
I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit the persons I see, according to my greatest ability and judgment, always providing proper informed consent of all alternatives, ramifications, risks and possible outcomes - for any and all treatments, herbs, supplements, medicines, procedures and surgeries.
I will preserve the unalienable rights endowed by the Creator on every individual human life, from conception to natural death. I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan for intentionally ending a life; and similarly I will not give a woman or cause an abortion. In purity and according to divine law will I carry out my life and my art. I will enter them for the benefit of the sick, avoiding any voluntary act of impropriety or corruption, including the seduction of women or men. Whatever I see or hear in the lives of those I care for, whether in connection with my professional practice or not, I will keep secret, as considering all such things to be private.
I will, remain faithful to this oath and fiercely and honorably battle illnesses regardless of societal coercion, derision by others or imperilment to my livelihood and life. So long as I maintain this Oath faithfully and without corruption, may it be granted to me to partake of life fully, and the practice of my art to heal and mentor for staying healthy, giving glory to God for His gift of healing. However, should I transgress this Oath and violate it, may the opposite be my fate.
So help me GOD.
they abide by, adhere to, and practice within its ethos?
by Rose Rohloff
- EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) proposed to DARPA with intentional design
- DARPA refused because gain-of-function (GOF)
- EHA did anyways under the Health & Human Services (HHS-NIAID)
- The shots contain ACE2 binders - spike proteins
- Fauci at NIAID knew it was GOF
* Not natural: chimeric infectious clones, GOF
by Rose RohloffOn July 12, 1974, the National Research Act (Pub. L. 93-348) was signed into law, there-by creating the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. One of the charges to the Commission was to identify the basic ethical principles that should underlie the conduct of biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects. |
- Dr. Hideyo Noguchi of the Rockefeller Institute for Medicine in Manhattan, New York City injected 146 hospital patients (some were children) with a syphilis extract (1911);
- Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) wide use (1940s-1972);
- Fluoride in water (1945-2024)
- Nuremberg War Tribunals (1947);
- U.S. Navy sprayed large quantities of the bacteria serratia marcescens over the city of San Francisco, as part of Operation Sea-Spray (1950s);
- Mentally disabled children at the Willowbrook State School in Staten Island, New York, were intentionally infected with viral hepatitis, for research purposes, to help "discover a vaccine" (1950s - 1972);
- Thalidomide with massive birth defects (1950s-60s) which led to the Kefauver Amendment (1962) "... to the Food, Drugs, and Cosmetic Act, also known as the Drug Efficacy Amendments of 1962, was signed by President John F. Kennedy and requires that all new drug applications demonstrate substantial evidence of the drug’s efficacy for the marketed indication, in addition to the existing requirement of demonstrating the drug’s safety ... In addition, the Amendment required drug advertising to disclose accurate information about side effects and efficacy of treatments.;
- Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) experiments (1950s-60s);
- the Radiation experiments (injection of radioactive elements, including polonium, plutonium, and uranium, into civilian patients around the country, (April 1945 and July 1947);
- Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (1930s-70s);
- Asbestos (1970-1990, 2003)
- Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 (updated 2000) built upon the Nuremberg code as the basis for Good Clinical Practices;
- Chester M. Southam, MD, a noted immunologist at Sloan-Kettering Institute, obtained funding from the government and injected live cancer cells into 14 patients with advanced cancer and into healthy convicts at Ohio State Prison, and injected live cancer cells into 22 elderly patients at Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in Brooklyn (1954-1963) “Every human being has an inalienable right to determine what shall be done with his own body. These patients then had a right to know the contents of the syringe: and if this knowledge was to cause fear and anxiety or make them frightened, they had a right to be fearful and frightened and thus say NO to the experiment. (Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, 2008)”
- Operation Crimson Mist, Rwanda (1994) electromagnetic augmentation (5G)?; now,
- Gain-of-function spike proteins, with mRNA/mmRNA/modRNA/Viral Vectors injections, does not fall under any legal definition of vaccine, with gross morbidity and mortality (2019 - ...)
... review this timeline of U.S. government and military-run experiments on civilians, prisoners and soldiers. A history of biological experiments on Americans and other civilians
- 1931: Cancer Experiments Location : Various government and civilian hospitals Details : The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations infected human subjects with cancer cells. Dr. Cornelius Rhoads established U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah, and Panama, and conducted radiation exposure experiments on patients.
- 1935: Pellagra Study Location : Not specified Details : The U.S. Public Health Service acted to curb pellagra, a dietary deficiency, admitting it had known the causes for over two decades.
- 1940: Malaria Experiments Location : Chicago, Illinois Details : Four hundred prisoners were infected with malaria to test experimental drugs.
- 1942: Mustard Gas Experiments Location : Not specified Details : Four thousand servicemen, mostly Seventh-day Adventists who were conscientious objectors, served as human guinea pigs for mustard gas experiments.
- 1946: Medical Experiments on Veterans Location : Veterans Administration hospitals Details : World War II veterans recovering from wartime wounds were used as subjects in medical studies and experiments.
- 1950: Radiation Experiments Location : Desert areas Details : The Department of Defense detonated nuclear devices and monitored unsuspecting civilians in cities downwind for medical problems and mortality rates.
- 1949-1969: Biological Agent Field Tests Location : 239 populated areas including New York City, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Key West, Panama City, Minneapolis, Alaska, and St. Louis Details : The U.S. military and intelligence agencies conducted field experiments with biological agents.
- 1961-1964: Operation Ranch Hand Location : Vietnam (Mekong to the DMZ) Details : Defoliants, including Agents Green, White, Pink, Purple, Blue, and Orange, were sprayed.
- 1960s: Tularemia Experiments Location : Vietnam Details : Seventh-day Adventists serving as non-combatants were exposed to airborne tularemia by Fort Detrick personnel and developed acute tularemia.
- 1960-1966: Langhat Virus and Kyasanur Forest Disease Virus Tests Location : Porton Down, UK Details : 33 terminal cancer patients were tested with these viruses. All testees died, two from encephalitis. 1945-1947: Plutonium Injections Location : Four large hospitals (Tennessee to Northern California) Details : Eighteen people diagnosed as terminally ill were injected with plutonium. 1946-1947: Uranium Salt Injections Location : University of Rochester Details : Six patients with good kidney function were injected with uranium salts. 1951-1952: Tritium Exposure Location : Richland, Washington Details : Fourteen people were exposed to tritium by breathing, immersion, or ingestion.
- 1963-1970: Radioactive Iodine Releases Location : Atomic Energy Commission Reactor Testing Station, Idaho Details : Radioactive iodine was released deliberately seven times.
- 1977: Senate Hearings Location : Washington, D.C. Details : Intelligence and military sources acknowledged the field experiments on at least 239 populated areas with biological agents between 1949 and 1969.
- 2017: Ricin Exposure Location : Various locations Details : FEMA inadvertently exposed nearly ten thousand firefighters, paramedics, and other responders to a lethal form of ricin during simulated bioterrorism drills.
- 2007: Anthrax Shipments Location : Various labs and defense contractors Details : An Army laboratory mistakenly shipped anthrax samples to various labs and defense contractors.
The law may not be negated, overwritten, or manipulated to force participation in experiments - by the government, employers, or companies, especially pharmaceutical companies - for whom the law was written to protect us; especially by labeling Emergency Use (EU). EU is for emergency circumstances with Informed Consent as part of Right to Try, if there are no other options for a patient. EU cannot supersede or try to negate the law especially regarding being fully informed with the Right To Say No - and the Right to Try alternative treatments. ![]()
|
1- Autonomous agents, individuals capable of deliberation about personal goals and of acting under the direction of such deliberation. The Government and companies have to give weight to autonomous persons' considered opinions and choices, and cannot obstruct their actions and judgments, nor deny individual freedom to act on considered judgments, and cannot withhold information necessary to make a considered judgment. Necessary information includes - but not limited to - all medical opinions by established, industry experts, health status, the necessary assessments, labs, with close monitoring of physical lab and test follow ups of each and every autonomous persons as part of clinical research and testing, along with full documentation of testing, efficacy, use of chimera for research and testing, any and all conceivable side effects, and interactions of conditions.
2- persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to added protections.
Violators to the law have been marketing to the most vulnerable, including the immature and the incapacitated who were in need of extra, added protections, even to the point of excluding them from any injections or procedures which may harm them; violating added safety precautions for children, elderly, or those with diminished capacity.
Informed consent - must include full disclosure of ALL contents to be injected, any and ALL possible side effects (which can be several pages long), how those persons are individually to be closely monitored, safety guidelines, and above all the right to say no before or at any time, and full reporting of all individuals regarding their safety monitoring/labs/assessments, and any and all side effects. By promoting COVID shots all still under clinical trial/research, and coercing with careers/jobs, inability to travel, etc. in order to take the shots, this law is being violated through: lack of informed consent, lack of protections of autonomous persons, and/or illegally acting as IRB safety board members marketing to those not autonomous and capable of self-determination, with higher standards of protection to be invoked, and assuming the role for their safety.
The maxim "do no harm" has long been a fundamental principle of medical ethics. Claude Bernard extended it to the realm of research, saying that one should not injure one person regardless of the benefits that might come to others.
An agreement to participate in research constitutes a valid consent only if voluntarily given. This element of informed consent requires conditions free of coercion and undue influence.
Undue influence also includes offers of an excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Also, inducements that would ordinarily be acceptable may become undue influences if the subject is especially vulnerable as in the case of targeting children, persons with limited capacity, and elderly with elements of mental defect, or instilling fear.
Short term morbidity and mortality cases from the shots are well reported and known, such as death, myocarditis along with spontaneous cardiac arrest with no warning, debilitating neurological conditions, etc. And, there is no means yet to determine mid and long term effects because Phase I trials have not been competed, let alone Phase II and III - which is vital information in order to determine informed consent.
Injustice has been performed with companies and government representatives, by involving vulnerable subjects, including the young, those unable to fully comprehend with all necessary information, and scaring parents with compromised capacity for free consent. In addition to lack of individual, tightly scheduled, continual monitoring and follow ups, autopsies of all persons involved in this trial participation should be conducted for reporting by the pharmaceuticals companies for any and all persons who received the shots, as well as labs determining efficacy and detriments (as examples, antigen creation, D-dimer, Pulse Cardiac and Troponin Tests) for all those who were coerced or unduly influenced to participate in research.
This law was created to protect people from government abuse through experimentation. The government cannot arbitrarily dismiss components, create resolutions or stipulations to supersede the law, as to invalidate its protection of individuals from them, including, but not limited to Health and Human Services (HHS) Center for Disease Control (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institute for Health (NIH), etc. and pharmaceutical companies, etc.
Persons have been illegally acting as members of, or bypassing, IRB safety review and monitoring of each and every person receiving injections, with open undue influence and coercion, to participate in Covid injections. Coercion has been especially directed to the diminished autonomous, children and elderly, through TV ads, library recordings, verbal encouragement, schools or other public venues acting as government agents, and/or clinical researcher recruiting participants, and/or illegally as untrained IRB member who is not following up to ensure safety of the people they recruited, coerced or used undue influence.
Overall lack of informed consent has become too often common practice across the healthcare industry, including people being given consent forms hours or minutes prior to surgery; no alternative treatments or lifestyle-nutrition changes prior to medications begin prescribed, and undue influence to intubate or perform surgery on patients in lieu of alternative treatments.
Dismantling PREP ACT pages 96-98 Kaiser, Newsom Court Case | ![]()
|
Lawsuits for unconstitutional violation of laws regarding shots
Guess what? Defendants in our lawsuits no longer argue that they had a right to mandate EUA drugs due to their state's at-will employment doctrine. That the EUA drugs can be mandated. That they had the authority to even issue the mandate. Why? Read the 127 pages, and then you'll understand that it was a legal lie from the beginning, but due to the novelty of the laws, no one knew of them. As courts have stated, "sometimes laws take naps," and these laws never showed up for work until now. https://coloradomedicalfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Stamped-Final-Complaint.pdf
full document https://coloradomedicalfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Stamped-Final-Complaint.pdf
page 127
C. the Secretary has no “authority to require any person to carry out any activity that becomes lawful pursuant to an authorization under this section…” 549. In 2005 Congress passed the PREP Act94 which provided the following regarding preemption of state law: (8) During the effective period of a declaration under subsection (b)…no State or political subdivision of a State may establish, enforce, or continue in effect with respect to a covered countermeasure any provision of law or legal requirement that— (A) is different from, or is in conflict with, any requirement applicable under this section; and (B) relates to the…administration…of the covered countermeasure, or to any matter included in a requirement applicable to the covered countermeasure under this section or any other provision of this chapter, or under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.]. 550. Therefore, via the PREP Act and 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3, Congress expressly prohibits Defendants from: A. interfering with the authority of the Secretary, B. establishing a condition not authorized by the Secretary, C. establish conditions contrary to the Secretary and the congressional statute under 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3, D. mandate participation in any 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 product or PREP Act activity, E. interfere with an individual considering participation in a 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 product or PREP Act activity, F. penalize a person refusing to participate in a PREP Act product or activity or 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 product. 551. The executive branch of the United States Government purchased all COVID-19 licensed and EUA drugs using federal funds. Congress expressly prohibits the federal government
Breaking…Gov Gavin Newsom and Kaiser have been sued in federal court for requiring healthcare workers to inject an experimental drug into their bodies as a condition to sell their labors in the marketplace. The requirement violated the workers’ Equal Protection of Laws and Due Process rights. Moreover, Kaiser signed a contract with the CDC promising not to mandate participation but did so anyway. Kaiser and Newsom fraudulently concealed the fact that nurses would be required to forfeit litigation rights if they incurred an injury from the use of the experimental drug. The California Nurses union stood by and refused to stop Newsom’s tyranny, leaving members without representation. Governor Newsom perpetuated the greatest assault on the US Constitution in the state’s history and the CA AG did nothing to prevent it. Worse yet, is that CA and Kaiser already had an agreement with HHS promising to never place an individual under a sanction for refusing to inject federally funded experimental drugs into the body.
Last edited10:55 AM · Nov 10, 2023
Governor Inslee and PeaceHealth hospital sued for requiring nurses to inject experimental drugs into their bodies without their free will and voluntary consent. It's like a real-life episode of Jekyll and Hyde. Read the lawsuit here: https://coloradomedicalfreedom.com/wp-content/upl The National Council of State Boards of Nursing and the Ohio Board of Medicine are requiring students to hand over their private identifiable biometric scans as a condition to take the nursing test. Notice the deflection in the message. They present facts as if they are lawful, meant to place fear in the hearts of nurses. But, they never say it's a lawful requirement, only why do you not want to give your scan. One does not have to answer this question. | Dr. David Martin: under 21 Code of Federal Regulations § 50.23 and 24 – Exception from General Requirements, it is illegal to make anybody participate in an experimental program using coercion. |
Legal Fact: Any state that penalized citizens or denied unemployment benefits to an individual terminated for the sole reason of refusing to inject an unlicensed investigational drug into their body violated the individual's Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Due Process rights. The U.S. Congress conferred legal authority onto an individual to either accept or refuse an EUA product. Both options were enacted by a valid act of Congress and must be equally protected. Moreover, the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution denied that state authority from interfering in the chosen option. The state established what courts call an Unconstitutional Condition. SCOTUS said: "But the power of the state in that respect is not unlimited; and one of the limitations is that it may not impose conditions which require the relinquishment of constitutional rights. If the state may compel the surrender of one constitutional right as a condition of its favor, it may, in like manner, compel a surrender of all. It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence." Governors and state agency directors violated their oath of office & the Constitution the moment they required COVID-19 EUA participation and or penalized an individual's federally protected option. They deprived citizens of their interest in liberty and property and, unfortunately for some, their very lives, all without due process. They did so by applying the law unequally demoting those who refused to that of a second-class citizen.
12:45 PM · Aug 29, 2023
BREAKING: LA Superior Court requiring LAPD to reinstate an officer terminated for refusing the vax mandate. Full back pay too! This is under a Writ of Mandamus, which is rare.
2:18 PM · Aug 21, 2023
Last edited9:28 PM · Aug 2, 2023
The VERY first EUA issued was in 2005 for the Anthrax investigational drug for service members and civilian employees of the DoD. The EUA stated: A. Individuals (service members and civilians) who refuse anthrax vaccination will not be punished. (Emphasis added) B. Refusal may not be grounds for any disciplinary action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. C. Refusal may not be grounds for any adverse personnel action. Nor would either military or civilian personnel be considered non-deployable or processed for separation based on refusal of anthrax vaccination. D. There may be no penalty or loss of entitlement for refusing anthrax vaccination, E. This information shall read in the trifold brochure provided to potential vaccine recipients as follows: You may refuse anthrax vaccination under the EUA, and you will not be punished. No disciplinary action or adverse personnel action will be taken. You will not be processed for separation, and you will still be deployable. There will be no penalty or loss of entitlement for refusing anthrax vaccination. Nothing in law has changed to negate the authority of DoD members to refuse EUA COVID-19 drugs except the 6 civilian appointees engaged in willful misconduct against our Armed Forces.
11:51 PM · Sep 3, 2023
A 40-year old mother went to the doctor after treating herself holistically for some laryngitis, stuffy nose, congested sinus, with continued symptoms after five days. After an exam, the doctor stated, “I am not going to give you antibiotics. You do not have a fever; your lungs sound clear. It looks like a little virus with severe allergies. I recommend an antihistamine.” The patient told him, “Thank you for not putting me on antibiotics when they are not needed, that makes me happy.” He responded, “I am glad you are glad.”
This story is sadly too often the new normal, numerous instances of patients and their caregivers stating issues of diagnosing with medication prescription, or misdiagnosis; the doctor or nurse having no idea of pre-existing conditions or a full list of medications currently being taken, a lack of care coordination or care planning because the time was not taken to simply read the chart (whether written or electronic), and ensuring a comprehensive history followed by the necessary physical assessment.
No physician or nurse should walk in to care for a patient without first having read the patient’s record, knowing all current information, the last visit/healthcare encounter, chronic conditions/comorbidities, and all medications; then, asking for updates of changes. Unfortunately, even without having to decipher poor handwriting, being able to read clean typed text, clinicians are not simply reading the basics of information they should before doing any diagnosing, planning and delivering of care - especially prescribing of medications.
As the dark side of IVF slowly comes into focus, even more transparency is needed by Pamela Mahoney Tsigdinos, July 27, 2018 |
Healthcare can leverage existing solutions with proven value from other industries, by adopting and adapting them with successful strategies. And, what has shown to be more successful than palliative care (PC) team coverage in healthcare, and Navy SEALs in the military, for team coordination with a singular mission focus. |
By rebranding PC teams and the team process, expanding with additional SEAL successful methods and approaches, we can create the Healthcare version of SEALs (sea, air, land), as APAC Teams (acute, post-acute, and community) - expanding the process to operate in every environment versus only in facilities, for enhancing the quality of care of high risk patients versus limiting to end-of-life cases.
The following chart displays characteristics of SEALs, obtained from several former SEAL, special operation personnel, and military officers; with several of the attributes emulating characteristics regarding the successful palliative care (PC) team process.
From Brent Gleeson, (BG) Navy SEAL, combat veteran, national speaker, leadership training consultant | Rose Rohloff, palliative care success as a process - rebranding away from end-of-life association |
Why were SEAL Teams created? | Why were PC Teams created? |
“The origin of SEALs began in WWII as underwater demolition teams. As the years progressed through Vietnam, the need was recognized for unconventional, special operation assets. And so, the SEAL program combined the best resources, tactics and training from the various branches of the military; as Tier One special operations units, learning from current and past experiences.” BG | The teams began as comfort care for end-of-life patients to supply pain relief. With the growth of hospice to address comfort care for the dying, PC matured with specialty trained teams for coordinating care based on individual patient wishes. PC teams, like SEAL teams, consist of specialists from various disciplines across departments - usually a nurse (RN)/nurse practitioner (NP), social worker (SW)/case manager (CM), dietician (RD), pastoral care, a pharmacist (PhD), and sometimes a physician; all working with the primary care physician (PCP), determining patient’s desired quality of life outcomes, planning care, coordinating and communicating with the family/power of attorney – being a team advocate at the ground level for avoiding under/over/mistreatment. |
Why are SEAL Teams needed? | Why are APAC Teams needed? |
“To transform from old school hierarchy, to a needed organizational culture with vertical silos removed across departments. The culture is an adaptive network ecosystem, with a mindset shift to operate decentralized, to move swiftly and to learn fast.” | As with SEALs, healthcare needs to transform from old school hierarchy, to culture without vertical silos across departments – and more importantly the continuum. Expanding and rebranding PC teams to APAC teams would enable a culture that is an adaptive network ecosystem, with a mindset shift to operate decentralized, to move swiftly, and to learn fast with delivering personalized best practice, quality care. |
What is unique about SEAL teams, their composition & mission?“The teams are small and nimble for direct action and rescue. The program has a very well-defined culture, by design, with a difficult program that is totally focused on how to reach objectives, be adaptive, and based on learned lessons from the past; and, failure is not an option." BG "Another important distinction is that post 9/11, there was an increase in the level of hard training, instead of easier, with a widening of the pool. The program was made harder to ensure that teams are even more well trained with tighter controls.” BG SEALs are also experts at collecting information and intelligence through reconnaissance.* | What is unique about PC teams, their composition & mission?The teams are small and nimble for direct action, coordination and follow through. The program has a very well-defined culture, by design, and certified programs focus on how to reach objectives, be adaptive, and based on learned lessons from the past. The PC process needs the support to expand across continuums, so failure is not an option regarding the prevention of readmissions. Another important distinction is that healthcare needs to learn from the SEAL training regarding nursing, physician, and pharmacy programs, to again increase the level of hard training, instead of easier, with decreased credits and clinical experiences, while being able to graduate. The education needs to be made harder for clinicians, to ensure that they are quality, patient advocates. APAC teams are then elite trained for complex, chronic cases with tighter controls. APAC teams can be utilized for being proactive in care with collection and coordination of information for high risk patients defined as complex, chronic conditions. |
How are SEALs effective at trouble shooting at ground level?“There is a single mission narrative, ground level accountability to get the job done." SEALs work in all environments: desert and urban areas, mountains and woodlands, jungle and arctic conditions**; successfully operating across spectrums - sea, air and land. | How are PC teams effective at trouble shooting at patient level?There is a single mission narrative, with ground level accountability for individual care based on the patient's quality of life desires. What needs to be expanded is the seamless transition/hand-off of the PC process with regards to high risk patients, so APAC teams effectively function throughout the continuum for health – acute, post-acute and within the community. |
** http://www.nsonswmentor.com/Navy-SEAL.html
A great target population, as one example, is the increased volume of individuals with dementia. While speaking with a retired executive, who has a family member with 10 years of progressive dementia, she stated, “Doctors are focused on performing all procedures or surgeries for them, oftentimes doing over treatment because the family members have a high emotional investment: | The Palliative Care Process rebranded BECKER’S Hospital Review Rebranding the Primary Care Physician (PCP) October 7, 2016 along with new APAC Team approach - process, is redefining palliative care teams as medical care coordination using interdisciplinary teams, for achieving individual patient’s quality of life outcomes, in any environment. |
APAC teams would also address the necessary information gathering for determining the real issues of consumers, for example, who needs dietary changes or removal of drugs with side effects before being prescribed new medications by physicians, causing even more side effects or noncompliance, and self medicating or opiate abuse.
PC teams can be expanded to APAC teams utilizing the successful palliative care process across the care and health continuum, eliminating the end-of-life association, and differentiating from the terminally ill care of hospice. Just as SEALs operate in every environment (air, sea and land), APAC teams can be an extension of PC teams to be the quick, nimble action teams in all settings, especially the community, for patients with complex and chronic conditions.
WatchPAT is an FDA-approved portable diagnostic device that uniquely uses finger based physiology and innovative technology to enable simple and accurate Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) testing while avoiding the complexity and discomfort associated with traditional air-flow based systems.
by Rose M. RohloffMany articles and discussions have centered around the rise and demise of Theranos. The company valuation and strategy were based on their technology for running multiple tests, at reduced cost, utilizing a pin-prick instead of a regular needle blood draw. Learned lessons from the devaluation and closing of the labs and blood testing centers include the lack of transparency, the need for thoroughly vetting new innovation, the requirement to understand the actual market, the need to support vision with qualified proof-of-concept, as well as deficient oversight and due diligence - to name a few. One lesson of success, however, has been overlooked: The model of a needed paradigm was beginning to be established. Leaders in the healthcare industry tout the need for enabling consumers to be more engaged with their own health. The vision for Theranos to offer new blood testing technology also precipitated three (3) key factors supporting increased consumerism: | 1- having lab results sent simultaneously to consumers/customers at the same time to their physicians, within 24 hours; 2- the passage of AZ law HB 2645, enabling individuals to order their own blood tests from a licensed clinical lab without a doctor's order, paying cash; and 3- easier access to get lab tests performed through multiple, local health and wellness pharmacies, instead of going to a lab or hospital. This paradigm has not been discussed as successful, and one key component for involvement with control over one's own health, expanding the traditional care continuum to a health maintenance continuum. |
With the many lessons learned from an aborted (shady) startup, marketed to disrupt the healthcare industry with its counterfeit technology, the direction for having consumer-driven as the process should not be overlooked - and actually be revisited to expand upon the great health ownership model of good disruption to healthcare.
click an article
to read and post comments
Search topic
select category
All
APAC Teams
Care Quality
Champion Your Own Care
Clinician Quality Education
Experience Satisfaction
Healthcare Consumerism
Health Innovation
Medical Care Coordination
Palliative Care
Patient Engagement
Physicians
Population Health
Transitioning Care Coverage
search by date
March 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
July 2024
June 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
June 2023
May 2023
October 2022
September 2022
July 2022
August 2020
April 2020
January 2020
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
September 2017
June 2017
October 2016
September 2016
May 2016
March 2016
October 2015
June 2015